To be there it should be one and he same and that be me and the one called the Right and the Left and he be me
It should be good to be able to make it all the way and that is why it should be them and there and that is the way and that is the why and that is should not be and that is why and not they and that should be the one and the all and should be it and that should be the way and that should be here and there and not go and not so and it should be able to make it to the end and then to the begin and it should be here and then there and that should be that and that should be soon and not here and not there and that be the same and not the good nor the bad and it is so and it is so and bye and it is bye and not go and it is so and so.
It is sood and sood and not the sood but the one who is and isn’t and that should be good and not should and it be go and not go and so it is and so it is not and bye and bye.
Theorum 3 – What is the one called the end of the ro’ and what is its name?
It is the way that the one is the same as the two and that means all is the end and that is that (using Number Theory)
OR – Theorum 4
It is the end of the tie and that is the end of it. (Using New Maths and that means all is the same is it not, Professor B?)
OR Theorum 5
It is the same using the New Theory called the Algebraic Sum and that can get complex to think about but not as bad as say…THIS:
in the end it is sum and no’ so it is and it isn’t.
OR Theorum 7
Using the Newest Maths available (only at MIT)
It is sum and no’ and therefoe it is so and so it isn;t and so it is.
OR Theorum 8
Using the Apollo (that is You, my Dear Sweetheart Anne since I name it after You of course), the language of programming called Python, after me, I say:
That is all.
OR Theorum 9
Apollo equals the nought and that makes for all and sundry and that is that.
OR Theorum 10
Them is to now and it is and it isn’t and that is the fact and that is such it is and so it is and so it is not and that is not and that is so go and go not and that is the end of the Theorum unless I say so and that means there IS another way that you haven’t thought of Prof B and that is:
There is tine and there is not and that means all of the above are true BUT it is not the em but the emma and that means all of the em are not here and so it is about time we all thought about a New Method that does not include programming since it is a bit of a hassle and it need keyboard and we want to blackboard it too don’t we so….
It starts here:
It is time to say goodbye to the workrate of evil and start to work fast, you with me so I will continue unabated so you can lurk with intent tomorrow when I finish it too and then you will know it is wrong since I am finished now but it ain’t and so I…
OR Theorum 13
I will now and so I will now and so I will now and so I will and so I will and so I will and so I will and so it is and that is that.
Which is in New Maths and not Old so don’t bother to look now Prof as you will be disappointed to find it is not in the dictionary of Maths yet.
It means that All are Sum and not All are some no’ and that is the future and not the past so it is com and it is com no’ and that goes to show it is true and not false, to prove another way is possible, again.
It is show and go so it is so and not so and it is so and so and it is so and it is so and so no’ and that is so and that is so no’ and that means:
(Yes Prof McCoy of MIT – because of your New Maths Work you should be Your Professor.)
It is so and not so and not and therefore it is.
It is not so and it is so it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and that makes it even and odd and so it isn;t but it isn’t and thta makes it in and out but not out and so it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is and it is.
(In normal language that means: If it is the same then it is if it is not then it is and that is why)
To continue the Theorum 17…
In the end it is time ahead and that makes it som and no’ and that means it all and so it is and so it is no’ and that makes all the worse and no’ the end and the end is all. It is so and it is not and that makes it so and not so and so it is and so it is and so it is and so it is and so it is and so it is and so it is and os it is and so it is and so it is and so it is and so it is and so it is and so it is and so it is and so it is and so it is and so it is and so it is and so it is and so it is and so it is and so it is and so it is and so it is and so it is and so it is and so it is and so it is and so it is and so it is and so it is and so….so it is and it is.
There is one and there is another and that is that and not and that is so and so it is and so it isn’t.
(Translated by Princess Anne: There is a sum but it isn’t)
It isn’t sum but it is and it is but it isn’t so do.
(Translated by Princess Anne: It is so it is and so)
Theorum 20 – by Princess Anne and dictated to me via intercom (in a manner of speaking).
It is and it shall.
(Translated by Her Majesty the Queen Elizabeth II REX: It isn’t shall not be)
Theorum 21 – By Princess Margeret of Spain and Genoa and Cook Island of France and the Real of All
It shall be then and there but in the end of all but by them all not
(Translated by Queen Elizabeth II REX and Com du Plom and Above Board and Below Stirrup as Such and That: It shall be and that is why and that is whyfore and so it is and so it isn’t and that is all and that is all my)
Theorum 22: By Prince Harry of Gul and the Realm of the Last and the Righ and so it is and so it is no’ and Bye!
Here it be and it be sum and sum it be
Translated by Princess Stephanie of Monacco:
t is for the u of them and no’ us
(t is for the one and no’ the two and that be goo’ bu’ no’ goo’ (Bryte))
…..is another way of saying the SAME thing so yours is shorter but better Princess Stephanie, I have simply presented another way of looking and that can be done with all of them so it is no’ the way one does it that is best but the shorter one is indeed the MOST efficient so go get lost Charlie my boy and be a man and read my blog!)
It is the shall and the when and it is so – by Princess Margeret again and it means:
So it is and so it is no’ and Bye – by Stephanie of Europe and the World i.e. Stephanie and Europe and the Wor and that makes it even and odd so it is and so it is no’
(The translations are Corrolaries in Maths speak)
We have just written a Maths textbook basically so we shall call it:
“The Queen’s Mathematics” by Bryte and Associates.
IN the end it is about time you all learned it is not enough to do it you have to understand it.
now if I tell you all then it would take years of typing and I don;t have the time. Wait til you get to University.
Anyway here it is the next opne and it is about time you all understood that it is the right way and not the wrong way to be – to be black here in Bath since they are all too stupid to use a computer which is why they are still here when they have been told to leave – all of them from Bath and others like you, Storey and Son.
In the meantime:
The equation is:
What is the time and when is it?
The answer is (using Number Theory again)
1 – 1 and that is it.
It has been suggested that there is another Theorum to do but I have already done it so Gary Locke stole the book so he could claim credit when I leave the earth, i.e. die since he relied on Vincent the Quiet Night sod so well.
It is so equal that I can write it again without looking so here it is:
n is equal to none and so it is gone which is the solution now what is the question (again using Number Theory). Gary Locke?
The question therefore is this:
What is 1 or what is the variable about which there in none and that is why it is.
Bruce E Saunders
(d**2)x/dy**2 + (d**2)y/dr**2 =(d**2)r/dy**2
– Stoke’s Theorum of the expression through a pipe (for cool skating – jislaaik!)
(Not really but I say it’s a cool idea.)
d/dx of the one is the same as the other so too is the right and the left and it goes to sow that none is the same.
Using Number Theory.
and why it should not be a concern and why it is good but not for the use for which it is planned since it will never be what you think, scientists as it is limited but not so – depending upon how you look at it.
That is – once you know what it is good for you will be surprised but not dismayed but it will never be able to make you understand that you are the One and not it, since it is not able to convince you that it is limited but You Are so you do not understand it and that is the failing of YOU scientist and not the people who doubt you.
YOU will not fond this even THOUGHT of anywhere in the world as of yet, not even written or sketched, so you Doubter are not wrong but it is a learning experience FOR ALL including the most advanced scientific mind not least because I am further ahead than they are in their thinking I am afraid I have to say.
It is a fact that you, scientist, to whom I am speaking, do not know what it is good for, so why the smile like you know everything?
INTERLUDE while I deal with a Bath Fuck who is clee’ing on illegally to my computer/PC.
I’ll prove it then since you ask and fancy yourself.
What is X? Your answer that it is an X co-ordinate indicates that you are foolish and have done history well but not Maths. Your answer is Descartian and therefore defunct i.e. out of date.
So try again. Let’s under Number Theory which is 30 years old.
Well? Your answer – X is….a tom? Are you sure?
Okay if you wish but of course you have it in your text so you can check my answer now when I say that under Number Theory
X is a tomber and a num. Am I correct to you of do you want some air?
Your question. What is the probabilty of…1? It is ovum. It is the definition of pi.
To continue…it is about time you realised I do NOT like you at all so I will keep it as so Mr Abrams of Maths Class B of the Kings School here in Bath.
Anyway you are wasting everybody’s time so f-off, Mr Abrams.
Anyway to ignore the peanut-brain Abrams I will continue.
If you take a lot of time thinking about this then you are foolish but you are NOT right Abrams My Man?
I am Leader of the ANC motherfucker.
Bye! Abrams go home to beddy-byes now while the grown-ups talk. Goodnight you Fucker with your slang verb and your woot sno’.
I need to see you all after school tomorrow when I feel better so shut up You!
Abrams LIKES to feel up little boys after school don’t you? About eight years old suits you, right? That’s where you discover Punnet and he’s well right? After you beat him TO DEATH for hauling you in to the Principal and she still doesn’t know what to do with you right, Herr Major, Head of the esteemed school here in Bath?
Anyway may I continue?
On A.I. or artificial intelligence as they call it now, even in the textbooks since it is not deemed well to call it by its real name now since it evokes fear of man-made things like soma or som which is still for sale here but I forget where, right, Mr Policeman?
I better continue this on a fresh page and it will be going onto my Biomimetics blog this time where I keep all my science shit, not on the ….zuma blog, okay? www.bruces23.com.
Biomimetics, Micro-design, Arctium minus et al Hook and Velcro – A PhD and a Virtual Textbook on Biological Attachment Mechanisms and their Mimicking
This Blog is Governed by British Military Law and Copyright B E Saunders MEng
To continue where Yelena left off this evenink. (Starting time 05h41 GMT)
I will begin by saying it is impossible to do this for I have not seen her work but I will continue it here and then she can do it and then I will later since I have a singing lesson later.
There is a fault with your eyeline, Sir Stephen and that is why you are not able to grasp the fundamental which she has illustrated so well, by which bravely in the face of your sarcasm and wit.
It is about time you admitted you are useless and unable to grasp a fundamental which has been bugging you for some time – you don;t understand the physics of propulsion since you never did fluid mechanics.
It is about time you admitted your limitation since a physics grad you will always be and that goes for all you Physica at Cambridge DAMP – you do not understand propulsion and it is your downfall and your limitation all of you.
Physics is not enough and why you did it – since it is easier than engineering and you know that, all of you. Astrophysics too is a little easier too though you won;t know it until you try engineering such as chem. eng. and realize it is fucking difficult to master and then pass exams in it all in one year, then for four years continuous. It is Extremely time intensive and much much more difficult that physics itself but it is all ego, not so Steven of Bath Uni?
X is the prime and not the fut and that makes it real and not x-wise and not right-wise and that goes to show you are all a about to fail your physics exam cos Stephen Hawking explained it to you wrong and that is a wrong thing to do.
If you take the wrong and the reed and then get the red you have what w call a mixture, you agree student?
Then if you take a right and then a ray you get a red and that means you have a ront and a rontu and that makes for the red and the rod but not the root and that means all the rest are about to be fall and that make the two and the fall the same and that is all we can say about it unless there are about to be a new and a newn and a newn is not the ren but the rent and that makes for the rest of the tie and not the ret of it.
So it equals the same and not the ret so do it now and get the answer or not, so to speak, since it is all uncertain.
It is about Heisenburg we are talking Stephen and Steve and it is about the uncertainty principle in propulsion and that makes it all high fallutin’ but marginally better than the end result which is here: (Pause)
Over to Yelena at Cambridge DAMP who has completed this work (it is 06h48 GMT now) but I will continue for corroboration.
So…it takes a lot of time to do this so here goes.
The answer is:
Jom and Jer.
Bruce E Saunders
soon to be regarded as
Copyright Bruce E Saunders 2017